November 17, 2024
3 min read

DoD Issues Final Rules on the Inapplicability of Certain Clauses to Commercial Items Contracts and Affiliate Companies of Small Businesses (11/15/2024)

No items found.
No items found.

The Department of Defense (DoD) issued three final rules amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) on Friday, November 15th, 2024. Two of these rules have positive material impacts on small business offerors on competitive DoD solicitations and subcontractors under DoD prime contracts. A synopsis of each is provided below.

DFARS Case 2024 - D016, Past Performance of Affiliate Companies of Small Business Concerns (Final Rule) -- This rule amends DFARS Subpart 215.305 (under the authority of 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR Chapter 1) to state under a new subparagraph (a)(2)(C) that for competitive solicitations, contracting officers shall consider relevant past performance provided for affiliates of offerors that are small business concerns.

This is great news for small businesses who can now use the past performance experience of their affiliates as part of their offer. However, caution should be taken and it is my personal suggestion that businesses disclose in their offer that the performance submitted is that of an affiliate and not claim it under their own name for full transparency and Contracting Officer info.

(Implements Section 865 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 (Pub. L. 118-31).)

Published: 11/15/2024 | Effective Date: 11/15/2024 (89 FR 90237)

----------------------------------------------

DFARS Case 2018-D074, Inapplicability of Additional Defense-Unique Laws and Certain Non-Statutory DFARS Clauses to Commercial Item Contracts (Final Rule) --

This rule modifies the list of provisions and clauses listed in DFARS Subpart 212.301 paragraph (f) which apply to DoD solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services to--

  • Remove DFARS Clause 252.203-7003, Agency Office of the Inspector General
  • Remove DFARS Provision 252.215-7007, Notice of Intent to Resolicit

This rule also modifies the list of provisions and clauses listed in DFARS Subpart 212.370 which are not applicable to contracts and subcontracts for the acquisition of commercial products, commercial services, and commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) items to ADD--

  • DFARS Clause 252.203-7003, Agency Office of the Inspector General
  • DFARS Provision 252.215-7007, Notice of Intent to Resolicit.

Similar clarifications are also made to the list of provisions and clauses in DFARS Subpart 212.371 which are not applicable to the acquisition of COTS items to ADD--

  • DFARS Clause 252.205-7000, Provision of Information to Cooperative Agreement Holders
  • DFARS Provision 252.204-7008, Compliance with Safeguarding Covered Defense Information Controls
  • DFARS clause 252.204-7012, Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting
  • DFARS provision 252.204-7019, Notice of NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements
  • DFARS clause 252.204-7020, NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements
  • DFARS clause 252.204-7021, Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification Requirements.

Since publication of the proposed rule for this case, other final rules have been issued and the changes below were necessary to this final rule as a result.

  • DFARS Subpart 212.371 was revised to add the following clauses to the list of solicitation provisions and clauses that are inapplicable to contracts solely for the acquisition of COTS items:
    • DFARS Clause 252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting
    • DFARS Clause 252.205-7000 Provision of Information to Cooperative Agreements Holders
  • DFARS Subpart 212.301 was revised to add DFARS Provision 252.203-7005, Representation Related to Compensation of Former DoD Officials, back to the list of provisions and clauses that apply to contracts for commercial products and commercial services.

(Implements Section 849 paragraphs (b) and (c) of the NDAA for FY 2018 (Pub. L. 115-91) and Section 837 of the NDAA for FY 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232).)

Published: 11/15/2024 | Effective Date: 11/25/2024 (89 FR 90233)

-------------------------------------------------

DFARS Case 2024-D026, Updates to the Definition of Departments and Agencies (Final Rule) -- This direct rule amends the definition of "departments and agencies" at DFARS Subpart 202.101 to add recently established defense agencies. There is no contractor action as a result of this rule.

Published: 11/15/2024 | Effective Date: 11/15/2024 (89 FR 90238)

(Copyright 2024 Federal Subcontract Solutions LLC)

Share this post
No items found.
Shauna Weatherly

View related posts

March 11, 2025

DoD Reduction In Force (RIF) Guidance

Just when you thought it couldn't get any more confusing, some agencies also have their own RIF guidance separate from the OPM guidance that is what we've heard the most about. DoD is one of those agencies.

A copy of the current DoD RIF guidance, DoD Instruction 1400.25, Volume 351, is found at: https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/140025/140025_V351.PDF?ver=DgEFMmb9dLDV7OV-PLb7VQ%3D%3D

This guide establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and prescribes procedures for reduction in force (RIF) actions taken under Part 351 of Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), as modified by Section 1597(f) of Title 10, United States Code (U.S.C.).

This guidance does not, in full, apply to DoD employees covered by an alternative personnel system (e.g., the Acquisition Demonstration; Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratories; and the Defense Civilian Intelligence Personnel System). Those systems will develop their own policies and procedures for RIF that comply with the law, as approved by the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (USD(P&R)). This guide also does not apply to Senior Executive Service (SES) positions.

The policy statement in 1.2 states that, "For any RIF of civilians in the competitive and excepted services in the DoD, the determination as to which employees will be separated from employment must be made primarily on the basis of performance."

In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 1597, DoD must report to Congress 45 days prior to implementing an approved RIF.

DoD will comply with 5 CFR 351.402 and 351.403 when establishing competitive areas and competitive levels, respectively. Competitive service employees and excepted service employees are placed on separate retention registers established in accordance with 5 CFR 351.404 and 351.405.

For purposes of DoD RIF, employees are placed in one of two categories:

  • employees with a period of assessed performance of less than 12 months, and
  • employees with a period of assessed performance of 12 months or more.

An employee’s period of assessed performance for purposes of RIF will be the sum of the months of assessed performance associated with the employee’s performance appraisals within the most recent 4-year period preceding the cutoff date established for the RIF. However, periods of time in a rating cycle for which an employee’s performance was not assessed are not included in the employee’s period of assessed performance.

For example, if an employee receives a rating after serving 10 months of the 12-month cycle, the employee’s period of assessed performance is 10 months for that rating cycle.

For employees absent for military service, periods of time during the rating period may be treated as periods of assessed performance if they meet the requirements of Paragraph 3.3.c.(1) under Paragraph 3.3.b.(2) of the DoD guide.

Retention Factors

Competing employees are listed on a retention register based on--

  • Rating of Record. See Section 3.3.c. for rating of record examples based on cutoff dates, military service, time frames for ratings to be used, and ratings from a system other and the Defense Performance Management Program (DPMAP).
  • Tenure Group. This follows the definitions found in 5 CFR 351.501(b) for competitive service and 5 CFR 351.502(b) for excepted service.
  • Average Score. In general, an employee’s average score for one performance appraisal is derived by dividing the sum of the employee’s performance element ratings by the number of performance elements. The average of the average scores drawn from the two most recent performance appraisals received by the employee, except when the performance appraisal reflects an “unacceptable” rating of record will be reviewed. When the most recent performance appraisal reflects an “unacceptable” rating of record, only that performance appraisal will be considered for purposes of the employee’s average score.
  • Veterans’ Preference. This follows the procedures in 5 CFR 351.501(c) with three veterans' preference subgroups:
    • AD - 30% or more disabled veteran
    • A - eligible for veterans' preference for the purpose of RIF but not for placement in the AD category (i.e., less than 30% disabled veteran determination)
    • B - not eligible for veterans' preference for purpose of RIF
  • DoD Service Computation Date-Reduction in Force (DoD SCD-RIF). Follows rules of credible service as found in 5 CFR 351.503(a) and (b). DoD does not follow 5 CFR 351.504, which grants additional retention service credit in RIF based on an employee's ratings of record.

Rounds in Reduction in Force (RIF)

Two rounds of RIF will be conducted. Round One, Release from Competitive Level, and Round Two, Assignment Rights, are explained in the document in detail related to types of appointments, order of release from the competitive level, and exceptions that may apply. They are found in sections 3.5 and 3.6, respectively.

Displacement may occur during Round Two. Displacement is the assignment of an employee to a continuing position in a different competitive level that is held by another employee with a lower retention standing (i.e., “bumping” another employee). Displacement may be at the same grade or at a grade up to three grades or grade intervals (or equivalent) below the position of the released employee.

Right of Only One Offer

Employees released from a retention register are only eligible for one offer of assignment (similar to OPM rules), with some exceptions. If the employee accepts and offer, rejects an offer, or fails to reply to an offer in a timely manner, they are not entitled to further offers. However, the DoD Component must make a better offer of assignment to a released employee (i.e., to a position with a higher representative rate) if a position becomes available before, or on, the RIF effective date.

Sample retention registers and scenarios are found in the guide in Appendix 3A. Employees have the right to request a review of retention registers and have representation also be allowed to review the registers, as requested by the employee.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

DISCLAIMER: Info is provided for awareness. I am NOT an HR professional but an HR enthusiast having started in HR and being a Federal supervisor and hiring manager. Before taking any action that changes your status, please seek the advice of an attorney knowledgeable in Federal employment law.

Fed Forward
DoD News
March 10, 2025

Voluntary Separation Incentive Payment (VSIP)

Voluntary Separation Incentive Payment (VSIP) allows agencies that are downsizing or restructuring to offer employees lump-sum payments up to $25,000 as an incentive to voluntarily separate. The amount received is reduced by Fed and state taxes, social security, and Medicare, as applicable.

The full guide on the program is found at the OPM website https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/workforce-restructuring/voluntary-separation-incentive-payments/guide.pdf

Eligibility for VSIP requires an employee be employed by an Executive Branch agency for at least three (3) continous years without a time limit and not be--

▶️ a reemployed annuitant;

▶️ otherwise be eligible for disability retirement;

▶️ recipient of a notice of involuntary separation for misconduct or poor performance;

▶️ recipient of any previous VSIP from the Federal Government;

▶️ on a service agreement for which--

➡️ a student loan repayment benefit was paid, or is to be paid, during the 36-months preceding the date of separation;

➡️ a recruitment or relocation incentive was paid, or is to be paid, during the 24-months preceding the date of separation; and

➡️ a retention incentive was paid, or is to be paid, during the 12-months preceding the date of separation.

If you receive a VSIP and later come back to Federal Service within 5 years of the date of the separation on which the VSIP is based, you must repay the entire amount before your first day of reemployment. This includes working under a personal services contract or other direct contract with the Government.

The top 10 questions related to VSIP can be found at https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/workforce-restructuring/voluntary-early-retirement-authority/top-10-frequently-asked-questions-about-vera-and-vsip.pdf

OPM's page on VSIP is at https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/workforce-restructuring/voluntary-separation-incentive-payments/

DISCLAIMER: Information is provided for situational awareness. I am not an HR professional but an HR enthusiast having been a Chief of Contracting and Federal supervisor. Please consult with an attorney knowledgeable in Federal employment law before making any decisions that impact your Federal employment status.

Fed Forward
March 10, 2025

Separate Your Government and Personal Communications

Feds...if you haven't separated your Government communications from your personal communications yet, now is the time to do it.

There has never been an expectation of privacy while using Government Furnished Equipment (GFE). But GFE has been allowed to be used for quick personal calls or emails to check in with children or with family members during the work day. And over time, you may have blended your Government and personal communications more than you realize.

Now, however, it appears your every digital and possibly physical move may be tracked, recorded, and stored. Software and hardware that tracks employee activity, digital behavior, and even movements within Government office space should be expected. Tracking software has (allegedly) already been pushed at some agencies or is (allegedly) expected to be pushed soon.

Computer monitoring programs are expected to track:

🔸️Key stroke loggers to record what is typed or edited

🔸️Analyze chats for flagged words

🔸️Network activity, file access, login, and online behaviors

🔸️Application usage and websites visited and what was searched

Expect software applications to be employed that will analyze this information and generate behavior risk scores by employee. Also expect that all online meetings and chats will be recorded, transcribed, and stored / archived for review without the choice to turn those features off.

Several employees at one prominent agency are reporting their GFE laptop cameras and possibly mics are being turned on during their work day without their consent and outside of active video meetings.

Highly suggest --

▶️ using a privacy cover for your webcam.

▶️ monitoring the activation light.

▶️ taking all personal calls away from your work space on a personal device.

▶️ taking other precautions to protect sensitive conversations, business and personal such as only using a personal device.

Fed Forward

Stay Updated, Stay Ahead

Get timely, actionable insights delivered straight to your inbox.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.