February 4, 2025
4 min read

Focus in FY2025: Who are the Buyers for the Government?

Contracting Basics
Contracting Basics

The word "buyer" gets thrown around a lot in the GovCon sector. But who are the buyers for the Government?

Answer? It depends.

There are a few key parameters that dictate if a Federal employee is a "buyer" or not:

▶️ The role of the individual "buyer" (again, an often misused term when talking about roles and who does what in the Federal acquisition process),

▶️ The total aggregate dollar value of the action, AND

▶️ The authority granted to that individual to obligate the government.

(Before reading more, and to learn more about the players / roles in the Federal acquisition process, check out this past FedSubK Feature, "Hate the Game, Not the Players - Know the Roles in Federal Contracting".)

Let's talk about each of those key parameters above.

First, "buyer" is a loose term not used in the Federal acquisition process because it's not specific enough to the roles that occur and the work performed. It's taken from private industry and used by GovCon's to oversimplify the process. "Buyers" in Government can be--

▶️ Any Government employee that has been issued a Governmentwide Purchase Card (GPC or "p-card). There are over 705,000 "GPC holders" (their official title for that role).

▶️ Procurement Assistants, administrative support staff of a contracting office.

▶️ Purchasing Agents, the lower graded employees in a contracting office that may also hold a GPC but have no other authority and support others on the simpliest buys. You don't see this role often anymore.

▶️ Contract Specialists -- journeymen who do most in the acquisition except they don't have authority to making Contracting Officer decisions or enter into / sign contracts.

▶️ Contracting Officers (COs in civilian agencies and KO in DoD), a Contract Specialist who has been granted specific decision-making and signature authority by means of a Contracting Officer Warrant.

▶️ Ordering Officers, a Contracting Officer or other trained individual granted written authority to place orders under existing contracts (like GWACs).

▶️ Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO), a Contracting Officer that can only perform administrative post award actions that do not impact the terms and conditions of the overall contract.

Notice that in the descriptions above not everyone makes buying decisions; that is reserved for the GPC holder at or below the micro-purchase threshold and the CO/KO, OO, or ACO for everything else; a select group with written authority. These are your "buyers".

BUT... decision making also extends to levels above the Contracting Officer, based on the dollar value of the action. The CO/KO is not always the final decision-maker and having "approval authority" is not the same thing as having "procurement authority" by means of a formal written instrument (a "warrant") which grants signature authority to sign contracts. Approvers are not "buyers" because they don't have that written authority to obligate the Government (aka, sign contracts). They are there strictly for oversight.

And let's talk a tad about "buyer's preferences" here for a moment. Buyers may seem to have "preferences" BUT...

What you are really seeing is an overall agency preference because every buy--YES, EVERY BUY--goes through a review process.

The basic review includes:

  • Acquisition Strategy -- Completed regardless of dollar value to ensure the purchase strategy is sound and the purchase is for an official use. Documentation is simplified and dependent on the complexity of the purchase.
  • Acquisition Plan (FAR 7.105) -- Formal process that addresses a review of the mission need (to include history of the need); acquisition milestones; conditions impacting the purchase; life-cycle, design-to-cost, and should-cost; delivery; risks; acquisition streamlining; sources; competition; selection of contract type; selection procedures; budgeting and funding; priorities, allocations, and allotments; contractor versus Government performance; inherently governmental functions; management information requirements; make or buy analyses; tests and evaluation; logistics considerations; government-furnished property; government-furnished information; environmental and energy conservation objectives; security considerations; contract administration; and other implications like foreign sales, special requirements, the Defense Production Act, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, industrial readiness, and more.

GPC holders and COs/KOs, OO, and ACOs have every action reviewed even when they are the decision-maker, which at a minimum is a peer review or supervisory review.

P-Card buys are reviewed by the supervisor and Approving Official (if not the supervisor) at a minimum to ensure the purchase is for official use and funds are available to make the purchase.

All actions over the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT, presently $250,000 and proposed to increase to $350,000 by 10/1/2025) require this more formal written Acquisition Plan. Review and concurrence is required by the Requiring Activity, Contracting Officer, Contracting Chief / Director, Small Business Technical Advisor, Office of Small Business Utilization, Chief Financial Office / Budget Officer, Chief Information Officer (as required for IT purchases), and Office of the General Counsel, along with any other personnel up to, and including, the Head of the Contracting Activity (HCA), depending on the dollar value. Some agencies also have Capitol Investment Boards and/or additional business case requirements for major systems investments and/or the procurement of contracts for Governmentwide use (i.e., OMB's "Best in Class" or GWAC contracts).

As you can see, being a "buyer" is not mean a single person can make the decision to expend funds; there is review and accountability, even for Contracting Officers with unlimited signature authority, as I was during my career. Federal contracting is NEVER done in a vacuum and the "buyer" is not the ultimate decision-maker.

Now you know when you hear the word "buyer" who that is and that they alone rarely make the purchase decision.

(Copyright 2/3/2025, Federal Subcontract Solutions LLC)

Share this post
Contracting Basics
Shauna Weatherly

View related posts

March 11, 2025

DoD Reduction In Force (RIF) Guidance

Just when you thought it couldn't get any more confusing, some agencies also have their own RIF guidance separate from the OPM guidance that is what we've heard the most about. DoD is one of those agencies.

A copy of the current DoD RIF guidance, DoD Instruction 1400.25, Volume 351, is found at: https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/140025/140025_V351.PDF?ver=DgEFMmb9dLDV7OV-PLb7VQ%3D%3D

This guide establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and prescribes procedures for reduction in force (RIF) actions taken under Part 351 of Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), as modified by Section 1597(f) of Title 10, United States Code (U.S.C.).

This guidance does not, in full, apply to DoD employees covered by an alternative personnel system (e.g., the Acquisition Demonstration; Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratories; and the Defense Civilian Intelligence Personnel System). Those systems will develop their own policies and procedures for RIF that comply with the law, as approved by the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (USD(P&R)). This guide also does not apply to Senior Executive Service (SES) positions.

The policy statement in 1.2 states that, "For any RIF of civilians in the competitive and excepted services in the DoD, the determination as to which employees will be separated from employment must be made primarily on the basis of performance."

In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 1597, DoD must report to Congress 45 days prior to implementing an approved RIF.

DoD will comply with 5 CFR 351.402 and 351.403 when establishing competitive areas and competitive levels, respectively. Competitive service employees and excepted service employees are placed on separate retention registers established in accordance with 5 CFR 351.404 and 351.405.

For purposes of DoD RIF, employees are placed in one of two categories:

  • employees with a period of assessed performance of less than 12 months, and
  • employees with a period of assessed performance of 12 months or more.

An employee’s period of assessed performance for purposes of RIF will be the sum of the months of assessed performance associated with the employee’s performance appraisals within the most recent 4-year period preceding the cutoff date established for the RIF. However, periods of time in a rating cycle for which an employee’s performance was not assessed are not included in the employee’s period of assessed performance.

For example, if an employee receives a rating after serving 10 months of the 12-month cycle, the employee’s period of assessed performance is 10 months for that rating cycle.

For employees absent for military service, periods of time during the rating period may be treated as periods of assessed performance if they meet the requirements of Paragraph 3.3.c.(1) under Paragraph 3.3.b.(2) of the DoD guide.

Retention Factors

Competing employees are listed on a retention register based on--

  • Rating of Record. See Section 3.3.c. for rating of record examples based on cutoff dates, military service, time frames for ratings to be used, and ratings from a system other and the Defense Performance Management Program (DPMAP).
  • Tenure Group. This follows the definitions found in 5 CFR 351.501(b) for competitive service and 5 CFR 351.502(b) for excepted service.
  • Average Score. In general, an employee’s average score for one performance appraisal is derived by dividing the sum of the employee’s performance element ratings by the number of performance elements. The average of the average scores drawn from the two most recent performance appraisals received by the employee, except when the performance appraisal reflects an “unacceptable” rating of record will be reviewed. When the most recent performance appraisal reflects an “unacceptable” rating of record, only that performance appraisal will be considered for purposes of the employee’s average score.
  • Veterans’ Preference. This follows the procedures in 5 CFR 351.501(c) with three veterans' preference subgroups:
    • AD - 30% or more disabled veteran
    • A - eligible for veterans' preference for the purpose of RIF but not for placement in the AD category (i.e., less than 30% disabled veteran determination)
    • B - not eligible for veterans' preference for purpose of RIF
  • DoD Service Computation Date-Reduction in Force (DoD SCD-RIF). Follows rules of credible service as found in 5 CFR 351.503(a) and (b). DoD does not follow 5 CFR 351.504, which grants additional retention service credit in RIF based on an employee's ratings of record.

Rounds in Reduction in Force (RIF)

Two rounds of RIF will be conducted. Round One, Release from Competitive Level, and Round Two, Assignment Rights, are explained in the document in detail related to types of appointments, order of release from the competitive level, and exceptions that may apply. They are found in sections 3.5 and 3.6, respectively.

Displacement may occur during Round Two. Displacement is the assignment of an employee to a continuing position in a different competitive level that is held by another employee with a lower retention standing (i.e., “bumping” another employee). Displacement may be at the same grade or at a grade up to three grades or grade intervals (or equivalent) below the position of the released employee.

Right of Only One Offer

Employees released from a retention register are only eligible for one offer of assignment (similar to OPM rules), with some exceptions. If the employee accepts and offer, rejects an offer, or fails to reply to an offer in a timely manner, they are not entitled to further offers. However, the DoD Component must make a better offer of assignment to a released employee (i.e., to a position with a higher representative rate) if a position becomes available before, or on, the RIF effective date.

Sample retention registers and scenarios are found in the guide in Appendix 3A. Employees have the right to request a review of retention registers and have representation also be allowed to review the registers, as requested by the employee.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

DISCLAIMER: Info is provided for awareness. I am NOT an HR professional but an HR enthusiast having started in HR and being a Federal supervisor and hiring manager. Before taking any action that changes your status, please seek the advice of an attorney knowledgeable in Federal employment law.

Fed Forward
DoD News
March 10, 2025

Voluntary Separation Incentive Payment (VSIP)

Voluntary Separation Incentive Payment (VSIP) allows agencies that are downsizing or restructuring to offer employees lump-sum payments up to $25,000 as an incentive to voluntarily separate. The amount received is reduced by Fed and state taxes, social security, and Medicare, as applicable.

The full guide on the program is found at the OPM website https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/workforce-restructuring/voluntary-separation-incentive-payments/guide.pdf

Eligibility for VSIP requires an employee be employed by an Executive Branch agency for at least three (3) continous years without a time limit and not be--

▶️ a reemployed annuitant;

▶️ otherwise be eligible for disability retirement;

▶️ recipient of a notice of involuntary separation for misconduct or poor performance;

▶️ recipient of any previous VSIP from the Federal Government;

▶️ on a service agreement for which--

➡️ a student loan repayment benefit was paid, or is to be paid, during the 36-months preceding the date of separation;

➡️ a recruitment or relocation incentive was paid, or is to be paid, during the 24-months preceding the date of separation; and

➡️ a retention incentive was paid, or is to be paid, during the 12-months preceding the date of separation.

If you receive a VSIP and later come back to Federal Service within 5 years of the date of the separation on which the VSIP is based, you must repay the entire amount before your first day of reemployment. This includes working under a personal services contract or other direct contract with the Government.

The top 10 questions related to VSIP can be found at https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/workforce-restructuring/voluntary-early-retirement-authority/top-10-frequently-asked-questions-about-vera-and-vsip.pdf

OPM's page on VSIP is at https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/workforce-restructuring/voluntary-separation-incentive-payments/

DISCLAIMER: Information is provided for situational awareness. I am not an HR professional but an HR enthusiast having been a Chief of Contracting and Federal supervisor. Please consult with an attorney knowledgeable in Federal employment law before making any decisions that impact your Federal employment status.

Fed Forward
March 10, 2025

Separate Your Government and Personal Communications

Feds...if you haven't separated your Government communications from your personal communications yet, now is the time to do it.

There has never been an expectation of privacy while using Government Furnished Equipment (GFE). But GFE has been allowed to be used for quick personal calls or emails to check in with children or with family members during the work day. And over time, you may have blended your Government and personal communications more than you realize.

Now, however, it appears your every digital and possibly physical move may be tracked, recorded, and stored. Software and hardware that tracks employee activity, digital behavior, and even movements within Government office space should be expected. Tracking software has (allegedly) already been pushed at some agencies or is (allegedly) expected to be pushed soon.

Computer monitoring programs are expected to track:

🔸️Key stroke loggers to record what is typed or edited

🔸️Analyze chats for flagged words

🔸️Network activity, file access, login, and online behaviors

🔸️Application usage and websites visited and what was searched

Expect software applications to be employed that will analyze this information and generate behavior risk scores by employee. Also expect that all online meetings and chats will be recorded, transcribed, and stored / archived for review without the choice to turn those features off.

Several employees at one prominent agency are reporting their GFE laptop cameras and possibly mics are being turned on during their work day without their consent and outside of active video meetings.

Highly suggest --

▶️ using a privacy cover for your webcam.

▶️ monitoring the activation light.

▶️ taking all personal calls away from your work space on a personal device.

▶️ taking other precautions to protect sensitive conversations, business and personal such as only using a personal device.

Fed Forward

Stay Updated, Stay Ahead

Get timely, actionable insights delivered straight to your inbox.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.